linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: silead_dmi: Add entry for the Teclast X98 Plus II

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve6fFEwm6v5txwa-uBpGrTra5+1xEF5Ps=cvyh=S6iLEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jan 2018 16:10:42 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: silead_dmi: Add entry for the Teclast
 X98 Plus II

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 03-01-18 00:40, Darren Hart wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:39:27PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:

>> Generally "testing" is the branch you want to base on if linus/master
>> doesn't work as the review-* branches *will* rebase frequently.
>> Exceptions exist of course, and this patch is just fine - just for
>> future reference.
>
>
> This is my "fault", I asked Paul to rebase on top of
> review-andy as that had 1 new silead_dmi patches missing
> from testing, so otherwise we would end up with a conflict when
> merging review branches. Same reason why I've been basing my
> silead_dmi patches on top of review-andy even though that is
> an unusual base to use.

Darren, in this case it's exceptional since there is a stream of a
patches against silead_dmi. They appear faster than older appear in
testing.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko