[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4ac1306-c58f-abfd-bafe-5ae70a67d0eb@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 16:26:35 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Patrick Lai <plai@...eaurora.org>,
Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 04/15] ASoC: qcom: qdsp6: Add support to Q6AFE
Thanks for the comments!
On 02/01/18 00:45, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 14 Dec 09:33 PST 2017, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote:
>
> [..]
>> +
>> +config SND_SOC_QDSP6_AFE
>> + tristate
>> + default n
>
> Do you see a particular benefit of having one kernel module per
> function? Why not just compile them all into the same q6dsp.ko?
>
No, I do not see any benefit in doing so, I can try to make it as single
module in next version.
>> +
>> +config SND_SOC_QDSP6
>> + tristate "SoC ALSA audio driver for QDSP6"
>> + select SND_SOC_QDSP6_AFE
>> + help
>> + To add support for MSM QDSP6 Soc Audio.
>> + This will enable sound soc platform specific
>> + audio drivers. This includes q6asm, q6adm,
>> + q6afe interfaces to DSP using apr.
> [..]
>> +struct q6afev2 {
>> + void *apr;
>
> apr has a type, even if it's definition is hidden you should use the
> proper type here.
>
I agree.
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + int state;
>> + int status;
>> + struct platform_device *daidev;
>> +
>> + struct mutex afe_cmd_lock;
>
> You shouldn't need to include afe_ in this name.
>
make sense!
>> + struct list_head port_list;
>> + spinlock_t port_list_lock;
>> + struct list_head node;
>> +};
>> +
> [..]
>> +/* Port map of index vs real hw port ids */
>> +static struct afe_port_map port_maps[AFE_PORT_MAX] = {
>> + [AFE_PORT_HDMI_RX] = { AFE_PORT_ID_MULTICHAN_HDMI_RX,
>
> Looks like you have an extra tab here, consider breaking the 80 char
> "rule" to not have to wrap these.
yep!
>
>> + AFE_PORT_HDMI_RX, 1},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct q6afe_port *afe_find_port(struct q6afev2 *afe, int token)
>> +{
>> + struct q6afe_port *p = NULL;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&afe->port_list_lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(p, &afe->port_list, node)
>> + if (p->token == token)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + spin_unlock(&afe->port_list_lock);
>> + return p;
>> +}
>
> Make port_list an idr and you can just use idr_find() instead of rolling
> your own search function.
>
Will give that a go.
>> +
>> +static int afe_callback(struct apr_device *adev, struct apr_client_data *data)
>> +{
>> + struct q6afev2 *afe = dev_get_drvdata(&adev->dev);//priv;
>
> This is perfectly fine, no need to extend the interface with a priv (so
> drop the comment).
I think it was a leftover, will clean such instances.
>
>> + struct q6afe_port *port;
>> +
>> + if (!data) {
>> + dev_err(afe->dev, "%s: Invalid param data\n", __func__);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> Just define on in the apr layer that data will never be NULL, that will
> save you 4 lines of code in every apr client.
>
I agree!
>> +
>> + if (data->payload_size) {
>> + uint32_t *payload = data->payload;
>
> So the payload is 2 ints, where the first is a command and the second is
> the status of it. This you can express in a simple struct to make the
> code even easier on the eye.
>
Will do that, if it make code more readable.
>> +
>> + if (data->opcode == APR_BASIC_RSP_RESULT) {
>> + if (payload[1] != 0) {
>> + afe->status = payload[1];
>> + dev_err(afe->dev,
>> + "cmd = 0x%x returned error = 0x%x\n",
>> + payload[0], payload[1]);
>> + }
>> + switch (payload[0]) {
>> + case AFE_PORT_CMD_SET_PARAM_V2:
>> + case AFE_PORT_CMD_DEVICE_STOP:
>> + case AFE_PORT_CMD_DEVICE_START:
>> + afe->state = AFE_CMD_RESP_AVAIL;
>> + port = afe_find_port(afe, data->token);
>> + if (port)
>> + wake_up(&port->wait);
>> +
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + dev_err(afe->dev, "Unknown cmd 0x%x\n",
>> + payload[0]);
>
> If you flip the check for payload_size to return early if there isn't a
> payload then you can reduce the indentation level one step and probably
> doesn't have to wrap this line.
yep make sense!
>
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +/**
>> + * q6afe_get_port_id() - Get port id from a given port index
>> + *
>> + * @index: port index
>> + *
>> + * Return: Will be an negative on error or valid port_id on success
>> + */
>> +int q6afe_get_port_id(int index)
>> +{
>> + if (index < 0 || index > AFE_PORT_MAX)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return port_maps[index].port_id;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(q6afe_get_port_id);
>> +
>> +static int afe_apr_send_pkt(struct q6afev2 *afe, void *data,
>> + wait_queue_head_t *wait)
>
> Rather than conditionally passing the wait, split this function in
> afe_send_sync(*afe, *data, wait) and afe_send_async(*afe, *data).
>
Will do that across other modules too.
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (wait)
>> + afe->state = AFE_CMD_RESP_NONE;
>> +
>> + afe->status = 0;
>> + ret = apr_send_pkt(afe->apr, data);
>> + if (ret > 0) {
>
> Check ret < 0 and return here, this saves you one indentation level in
> the following chunk.
>
> If you then check !wait and return early you can reduce another level.
>
okay!
>> + if (wait) {
>> + ret = wait_event_timeout(*wait,
>> + (afe->state ==
>> + AFE_CMD_RESP_AVAIL),
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>> + if (!ret) {
>> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + } else if (afe->status > 0) {
>> + dev_err(afe->dev, "DSP returned error[%s]\n",
>> + adsp_err_get_err_str(afe->status));
>> + ret = adsp_err_get_lnx_err_code(afe->status);
>> + } else {
>> + ret = 0;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + ret = 0;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + dev_err(afe->dev, "packet not transmitted\n");
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int afe_send_cmd_port_start(struct q6afe_port *port)
>> +{
>> + u16 port_id = port->id;
>> + struct afe_port_cmd_device_start start;
>> + struct q6afev2 *afe = port->afe.v2;
>> + int ret, index;
>> +
>> + index = port->token;
>> + start.hdr.hdr_field = APR_HDR_FIELD(APR_MSG_TYPE_SEQ_CMD,
>> + APR_HDR_LEN(APR_HDR_SIZE),
>> + APR_PKT_VER);
>> + start.hdr.pkt_size = sizeof(start);
>> + start.hdr.src_port = 0;
>> + start.hdr.dest_port = 0;
>> + start.hdr.token = index;
>
> Just put port->token here, saves you a local variable.
>
yep!
>> + start.hdr.opcode = AFE_PORT_CMD_DEVICE_START;
>> + start.port_id = port_id;
>> +
>> + ret = afe_apr_send_pkt(afe, &start, &port->wait);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(afe->dev, "AFE enable for port 0x%x failed %d\n",
>> + port_id, ret);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int afe_port_start(struct q6afe_port *port,
>> + union afe_port_config *afe_config)
>> +{
>> + struct afe_audioif_config_command config;
>> + struct q6afev2 *afe = port->afe.v2;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + int port_id = port->id;
>> + int cfg_type;
>> + int index = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!afe_config) {
>
> Looking at the one caller of this function, afe_config can't be NULL, so
> no need for this error handling.
>
okay.
>> + dev_err(afe->dev, "Error, no configuration data\n");
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + index = port->token;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&afe->afe_cmd_lock);
>> + /* Also send the topology id here: */
>> + config.hdr.hdr_field = APR_HDR_FIELD(APR_MSG_TYPE_SEQ_CMD,
>> + APR_HDR_LEN(APR_HDR_SIZE),
>> + APR_PKT_VER);
>> + config.hdr.pkt_size = sizeof(config);
>> + config.hdr.src_port = 0;
>> + config.hdr.dest_port = 0;
>> + config.hdr.token = index;
>> +
>> + cfg_type = port->cfg_type;
>> + config.hdr.opcode = AFE_PORT_CMD_SET_PARAM_V2;
>> + config.param.port_id = port_id;
>> + config.param.payload_size = sizeof(config) - sizeof(struct apr_hdr) -
>> + sizeof(config.param);
>> + config.param.payload_address_lsw = 0x00;
>> + config.param.payload_address_msw = 0x00;
>> + config.param.mem_map_handle = 0x00;
>> + config.pdata.module_id = AFE_MODULE_AUDIO_DEV_INTERFACE;
>> + config.pdata.param_id = cfg_type;
>> + config.pdata.param_size = sizeof(config.port);
>
> This looks like a good candidate for a afe_port_set_param() function.
>
makes sense.
>> +
>> + config.port = *afe_config;
>> +
>> + ret = afe_apr_send_pkt(afe, &config, &port->wait);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(afe->dev, "AFE enable for port 0x%x failed %d\n",
>> + port_id, ret);
>> + goto fail_cmd;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = afe_send_cmd_port_start(port);
>> +
>> +fail_cmd:
>> + mutex_unlock(&afe->afe_cmd_lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
> [..]
>> +/**
>> + * q6afe_port_get_from_id() - Get port instance from a port id
>> + *
>> + * @dev: Pointer to afe child device.
>> + * @id: port id
>> + *
>> + * Return: Will be an error pointer on error or a valid afe port
>> + * on success.
>> + */
>> +struct q6afe_port *q6afe_port_get_from_id(struct device *dev, int id)
>
> Will there be any other getter? Otherwise you can just call this
> q6afe_port_get().
There is one more get, which is basically lookup from index to port number.
>
>> +{
>> + int port_id;
>> + struct q6afev2 *afe = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>> + struct q6afe_port *port;
>> + int token;
>> + int cfg_type;
>> +
>> + if (!afe) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to find instance of afe service\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>> + }
>
> As this comes from the passed dev this check will catch bugs withing
> this driver, but if the client accidentally passes the wrong dev it's
> likely that you don't catch it here anyways. Consider dropping the
> check.
yes!
>
>> +
>> + token = id;
>> + if (token < 0 || token > AFE_PORT_MAX) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "AFE port token[%d] invalid!\n", token);
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> + }
>> +
>> + port_id = port_maps[id].port_id;
>> +
>> + port = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*port), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!port)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> + init_waitqueue_head(&port->wait);
>> +
>> + port->token = token;
>> + port->id = port_id;
>> +
>> + port->afe.v2 = afe;
>> + switch (port_id) {
>
> How about moving this switch statement above the allocation?
>
Yes, this can be done!
>> + case AFE_PORT_ID_MULTICHAN_HDMI_RX:
>> + cfg_type = AFE_PARAM_ID_HDMI_CONFIG;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid port id 0x%x\n", port_id);
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> + }
>> +
>> + port->cfg_type = cfg_type;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&afe->port_list_lock);
>> + list_add_tail(&port->node, &afe->port_list);
>> + spin_unlock(&afe->port_list_lock);
>> +
>> + return port;
>> +
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(q6afe_port_get_from_id);
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists