[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5Biwbwct_vBD3zXyFvFgW00JxVnFoDcQthARVLxdqPYhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 15:27:53 -0200
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: jacopo mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, geert@...der.be,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] media: i2c: tw9910: Remove soc_camera dependencies
Hi Jacopo,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:13 PM, jacopo mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org> wrote:
> That would be true if I would have declared the GPIO to be ACTIVE_LOW.
> See patch [5/9] in this series and search for "rstb". The GPIO (which
> is shared between two devices) is said to be active high...
Just looked at your patch 5/9 and it seems it only works because you
made two inversions :-)
Initially the rest GPIO was doing:
- gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTT3, 0);
- mdelay(10);
- gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTT3, 1);
- mdelay(10); /* wait to let chip come out of reset */
So this is an active low reset.
So you should have converted it to:
GPIO_LOOKUP("sh7722_pfc", GPIO_PTT3, "rstb", GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW),
and then in this patch you should do as I said earlier:
gpiod_set_value(priv->rstb_gpio, 1);
usleep_range(500, 1000);
gpiod_set_value(priv->rstb_gpio, 0);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists