[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM3PR04MB13157F7EFCEEFE030104C87DF51E0@AM3PR04MB1315.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 02:09:11 +0000
From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: imx6ul: add 696MHz operating point
Post this discussion mail to kernel mail list, since last mail is rejected due to incorrect format, sorry for confusion.
Best Regards!
Anson Huang
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:festevam@...il.com]
> Sent: 2018-01-02 11:32 PM
> To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
> Cc: moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE <linux-
> arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>; open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED
> DEVICE TREE BINDINGS <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>; linux-
> pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Mark
> Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>; A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>; Jacky
> Bai <ping.bai@....com>; viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>;
> rjw@...ysocki.net; Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>; Rob
> Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>;
> Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>; Shawn Guo
> <shawnguo@...nel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: imx6ul: add 696MHz operating point
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com> wrote:
>
> > There is a comment in VDD_ARM, VDD_SOC must NOT lower than VDD_ARM.
> >
> > Output voltage must be set to the following rules:
> > • VDD_ARM_CAP <= VDD_SOC_CAP
> > • VDD_SOC_CAP - VDD_ARM_CAP < 330 mV
>
> Thanks for the clarifcation.
>
> Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists