[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1514947923.3493.2.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 21:52:03 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...wei.com>,
xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 1/1] ima: re-introduce own integrity cache lock
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 17:40 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> [might as well cc linux-xfs]
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:22:37AM +0200, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could I ask FS maintainers to test IMA with this patch additionally
> > and provide ack/tested.
> > We tested but may be you have and some special testing.
>
> Super-late to this party, but unless xfstests has automated tests to
> set up IMA on top of an existing filesystem then I most likely have no
> idea /how/ to test IMA. I did a quick grep of xfstests git and I don't
> see anything IMA-related.
Back in June I posted a simple xfstests IMA-appraisal test (https://ma
rc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=149703820814885&w=4).
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists