[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180104225422.GG32035@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 23:54:22 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] x86/spec_ctrl: Add sysctl knobs to enable/disable
SPEC_CTRL feature
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:56:47AM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> .macro ENABLE_IBRS
> - ALTERNATIVE "jmp 10f", "", X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL
> + testl $SPEC_CTRL_IBRS_INUSE, spec_ctrl_ibrs
> + jz .Lskip_\@
> +
> PUSH_MSR_REGS
> WRMSR_ASM $MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, $SPEC_CTRL_FEATURE_ENABLE_IBRS
> POP_MSR_REGS
> -10:
> +
> + jmp .Ldone_\@
> +.Lskip_\@:
> + /*
> + * prevent speculation beyond here as we could want to
> + * stop speculation by enabling IBRS
> + */
> + lfence
> +.Ldone_\@:
> .endm
Yeah no. We have jump labels for this stuff. There is no reason what so
ever to do dynamic tests for a variable that _never_ changes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists