[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180104234227.GB13348@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 00:42:27 +0100
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] x86/idle: Disable IBRS entering idle and enable it
on wakeup
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:22:09PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> No one should be calling this with IRQs enabled. This check is probably
> just paranoid. I can get rid of it.
Yes, confirmed.
> It probably doesn't matter as we will be switching the check
> to the spec_ctrl_ibrs a couple of patches later.
The other problem with static_cpu_has is later the code intends to
support the cpuid rescan post late microcode update which will set
bits in boot_cpu_data (and transfer them to each cpu_has). If we'd
only support early microcode update static_cpu_has should have been ok
too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists