[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f04c997-cfed-1ee2-9b10-37955ce15f9e@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 13:56:33 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
<chao@...nel.org>, <yunlong.song@...oud.com>
CC: <miaoxie@...wei.com>, <bintian.wang@...wei.com>,
<shengyong1@...wei.com>, <heyunlei@...wei.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: check segment type in __f2fs_replace_block
Please add simple description here to explain why we need to add this, even
though this change is very simple.
On 2018/1/4 11:48, Yunlong Song wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 890d483..e3bbabf 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -2719,6 +2719,8 @@ void __f2fs_replace_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum,
> se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
> type = se->type;
>
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, se->valid_blocks && IS_NODESEG(type));
> +
> down_write(&SM_I(sbi)->curseg_lock);
>
> if (!recover_curseg) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists