[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180104080043.14506-27-hch@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:00:38 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 26/31] aio: sanitize ki_list handling
Instead of handcoded non-null checks always initialize ki_list to an
empty list and use list_empty / list_empty_careful on it. While we're
at it also error out on a double call to kiocb_set_cancel_fn instead
of ignoring it.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
fs/aio.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index 496b50f9e9b1..fe241b5b44b2 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -555,13 +555,12 @@ void kiocb_set_cancel_fn(struct kiocb *iocb, kiocb_cancel_fn *cancel)
struct kioctx *ctx = req->ki_ctx;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->ctx_lock, flags);
-
- if (!req->ki_list.next)
- list_add(&req->ki_list, &ctx->active_reqs);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&req->ki_list)))
+ return;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->ctx_lock, flags);
+ list_add_tail(&req->ki_list, &ctx->active_reqs);
req->ki_cancel = cancel;
-
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->ctx_lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kiocb_set_cancel_fn);
@@ -1034,7 +1033,7 @@ static inline struct aio_kiocb *aio_get_req(struct kioctx *ctx)
goto out_put;
percpu_ref_get(&ctx->reqs);
-
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->ki_list);
req->ki_ctx = ctx;
return req;
out_put:
@@ -1080,7 +1079,7 @@ static void aio_complete(struct aio_kiocb *iocb, long res, long res2)
unsigned tail, pos, head;
unsigned long flags;
- if (iocb->ki_list.next) {
+ if (!list_empty_careful(iocb->ki_list.next)) {
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->ctx_lock, flags);
--
2.14.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists