linux-kernel - Re: Coccinelle: Rename the script for a transformation of memory allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6e685bda-6f8f-4adf-4b0c-bf93b59981c2@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jan 2018 10:43:59 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Cc:     Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: Rename the script for a transformation of memory
 allocations

>> Would you find the file name selection “zalloc-extra_changes1.cocci” acceptable?
> 
> No.

Next try then …

> I do't know what the extra changes are

This script for the semantic patch language was designed in the way
that more source code would be adjusted (or just reformatted)
than I see as an essential transformation for the replacement
of function calls in the shown case.

Example:
…
(
- x = kmalloc(E1,E2);
+ x = kzalloc(E1,E2);
|
…

We are discussing consequences from the specification of a different
change granularity for a while.
I hope that another SmPL script variant could be integrated
which will work with a higher precision then so that involved
software developers can choose the preferred transformation approach
also on their own.

> and I don't know what the number 1 means.

How do you think about to start with numbering for subsequent
SmPL scripts?

Regards,
Markus