[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4753ea7-44b3-9c5f-3bb8-4a6654ccea88@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:16:39 +0100
From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: konrad.wilk@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: suppress warning when __GFP_NOWARN is set v4
Am 04.01.2018 um 10:53 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> This seems to collide with my dma direct/swiotlb series posted recently.
>
>> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
>> @@ -490,11 +490,11 @@ static void swiotlb_bounce(phys_addr_t orig_addr, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
>> - dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr,
>> - phys_addr_t orig_addr, size_t size,
>> - enum dma_data_direction dir,
>> - unsigned long attrs)
>> +static phys_addr_t tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
>> + dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr,
>> + phys_addr_t orig_addr, size_t size,
>> + enum dma_data_direction dir,
>> + unsigned long attrs, bool warn)
> We already have DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN which can be passed in attrs. Please
> use it instead of reinventing it.
>
>> swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
>> dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags)
>> {
>> + bool warn = !(flags & __GFP_NOWARN);
>> dma_addr_t dev_addr;
>> void *ret;
>> int order = get_order(size);
>> @@ -739,7 +750,7 @@ swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
>> * will grab memory from the lowest available address range.
>> */
>> phys_addr_t paddr = map_single(hwdev, 0, size,
>> - DMA_FROM_DEVICE, 0);
>> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE, 0, warn);
> Note: in my above series swiotlb_alloc_coherent is going away, and
> replaced with a swiotlb_alloc that takes a dma_attrs argument.
That's what I thought about as well, but this is a bug fix for stable
kernels. So the changes should be as small as possible.
But using DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN is a good point, going to send a v5 which
uses this instead.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Using that for passing the nowarn flag is the right way to go instead
> of using __GFP_NOWARN.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists