[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ebf49e7f-7008-18b8-62d9-9f3dc2de6a54@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:04:30 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: dra7xx: Fix legacy INTD IRQ handling
Hi,
On Thursday 04 January 2018 11:38 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 29 December 2017 05:11 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>> Legacy INTD IRQ handling is broken on dra7xx due to fact that driver
>> uses hwirq in range of 1-4 for INTA, INTD whereas IRQ domain is of size
>> 4 which is numbered 0-3. Therefore when INTD IRQ line is used with
>> pci-dra7xx driver following warning is seen:
>>
>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:342 irq_domain_associate+0x12c/0x1c4
>> error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy
>>
>> Fix this by using pci_irqd_intx_xlate() helper to translate the INTx 1-4
>> range into the 0-3 as done in other PCIe drivers.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>> Reported-by: Chris Welch <Chris.Welch@...visolutions.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
>
> Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>> index 58aed0896468..892f93910012 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_intx_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
>>
>> static const struct irq_domain_ops intx_domain_ops = {
>> .map = dra7xx_pcie_intx_map,
>> + .xlate = pci_irqd_intx_xlate,
Looking at this again, I think the mapping should be done in device tree using
the interrupt-map property.
Lorenzo, can you hold merging this patch till we verify using the dt approach?
Thanks
Kishon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists