[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180104133555.8449-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 13:35:55 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][cifs-next] CIFS: SMBD: make functions smbd_recv_buf and smbd_recv_page static
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The functions smbd_recv_buf and smbd_recv_page are local to the source
and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
Cleans up sparse warnings:
symbol 'smbd_recv_buf' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'smbd_recv_page' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
index 731577d4317f..0d0545ef735f 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
@@ -1855,7 +1855,8 @@ struct smbd_connection *smbd_get_connection(
* consumed. But this will require more changes to upper layer code, and also
* need to consider packet boundaries while they still being reassembled.
*/
-int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size)
+static int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf,
+ unsigned int size)
{
struct smbd_response *response;
struct smbd_data_transfer *data_transfer;
@@ -1995,8 +1996,8 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size)
* to_read: the length of data to read
* return value: actual data read
*/
-int smbd_recv_page(struct smbd_connection *info,
- struct page *page, unsigned int to_read)
+static int smbd_recv_page(struct smbd_connection *info,
+ struct page *page, unsigned int to_read)
{
int ret;
char *to_address;
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists