[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180104142530.ffz26qs66c6y7b2h@flea.lan>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:25:30 +0100
From: maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com
To: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Cc: airlied@...ux.ie, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
wens@...e.org, architt@...eaurora.org, a.hajda@...sung.com,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com,
narmstrong@...libre.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] clk: sunxi-ng: Don't set k if width is 0 for nkmp
plls
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 10:01:53PM +0100, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> For example, A83T have nmp plls which are modelled as nkmp plls. Since k
> is not specified, it has offset 0, shift 0 and lowest value 1. This
> means that LSB bit is always set to 1, which may change clock rate.
>
> Fix that by applying k factor only if k width is greater than 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
This looks fine...
> ---
> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
> index e58c95787f94..709f528af2b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkmp_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> unsigned long parent_rate)
> {
> struct ccu_nkmp *nkmp = hw_to_ccu_nkmp(hw);
> - unsigned long n, m, k, p;
> + unsigned long n, m, k = 1, p;
> u32 reg;
>
> reg = readl(nkmp->common.base + nkmp->common.reg);
> @@ -92,11 +92,13 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkmp_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> if (!n)
> n++;
>
> - k = reg >> nkmp->k.shift;
> - k &= (1 << nkmp->k.width) - 1;
> - k += nkmp->k.offset;
> - if (!k)
> - k++;
> + if (nkmp->k.width) {
> + k = reg >> nkmp->k.shift;
> + k &= (1 << nkmp->k.width) - 1;
> + k += nkmp->k.offset;
> + if (!k)
> + k++;
> + }
... but could you add a comment there to explain why you're using a
different construct than the one used for the other factors?
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists