lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180104142530.ffz26qs66c6y7b2h@flea.lan>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:25:30 +0100
From:   maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com
To:     Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Cc:     airlied@...ux.ie, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        wens@...e.org, architt@...eaurora.org, a.hajda@...sung.com,
        Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, mturquette@...libre.com,
        sboyd@...eaurora.org, Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com,
        narmstrong@...libre.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] clk: sunxi-ng: Don't set k if width is 0 for nkmp
 plls

Hi,

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 10:01:53PM +0100, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> For example, A83T have nmp plls which are modelled as nkmp plls. Since k
> is not specified, it has offset 0, shift 0 and lowest value 1. This
> means that LSB bit is always set to 1, which may change clock rate.
> 
> Fix that by applying k factor only if k width is greater than 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>

This looks fine...

> ---
>  drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
> index e58c95787f94..709f528af2b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkmp_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  					unsigned long parent_rate)
>  {
>  	struct ccu_nkmp *nkmp = hw_to_ccu_nkmp(hw);
> -	unsigned long n, m, k, p;
> +	unsigned long n, m, k = 1, p;
>  	u32 reg;
>  
>  	reg = readl(nkmp->common.base + nkmp->common.reg);
> @@ -92,11 +92,13 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkmp_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  	if (!n)
>  		n++;
>  
> -	k = reg >> nkmp->k.shift;
> -	k &= (1 << nkmp->k.width) - 1;
> -	k += nkmp->k.offset;
> -	if (!k)
> -		k++;
> +	if (nkmp->k.width) {
> +		k = reg >> nkmp->k.shift;
> +		k &= (1 << nkmp->k.width) - 1;
> +		k += nkmp->k.offset;
> +		if (!k)
> +			k++;
> +	}

... but could you add a comment there to explain why you're using a
different construct than the one used for the other factors?

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ