[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v66xjXgX4em1=Uv-sAoAX77B86EOgwuv_vYrbJ5015FcwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 22:50:49 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, thomas@...sch.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/sun4i: backend: Make sure we don't have a
commit pending
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> If we try to read the backend registers while it fetches the new values, we
> end up with the value of some random register instead of the one we asked
> for.
>
> In order to prevent that, let's make sure that the very first thing we do
> during our atomic modesetting is to let the commit bit come to a rest.
>
> We don't have to worry about anything else since the only time we will
> trigger a new transaction is during the atomic_commit which comes much
> later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists