[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180104161728.GC14721@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 13:17:28 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf-probe: Ensure debuginfo's build-id is correct
Em Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 04:29:03PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> Ensure that the build-id of debuginfo is correctly
> matched to target build-id, if not, it warns user
> to check the system debuginfo package is correctly
> installed.
So we look at a variety of files looking for one that has a matching
build-id, I think the warning message should state that the file with
the unmatched build-id is simply being skipped, no?
And why do this at 'perf probe -l' time? I.e. at that point whatever
probes that are in place already have all the needed debug info?
I.e. the warning should be done at probe creation time only?
- Arnaldo
> E.g. on such environment, you will see below warning.
> ======
> # perf probe -l
> WARN: There is a build-id mismatch between
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so.debug
> and
> /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so
> Please check your system's debuginfo files for mismatches, e.g. check
> the versions for the target package and debuginfo package.
> probe_libc:malloc_get_state (on malloc_get_state@...BC_2.2.5 in /us
> r/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> ======
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> index a5731de0e5eb..5bb71e056b21 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> @@ -119,9 +119,11 @@ enum dso_binary_type distro_dwarf_types[] = {
>
> struct debuginfo *debuginfo__new(const char *path)
> {
> + u8 bid[BUILD_ID_SIZE], bid2[BUILD_ID_SIZE];
> enum dso_binary_type *type;
> char buf[PATH_MAX], nil = '\0';
> struct dso *dso;
> + bool have_build_id = false;
> struct debuginfo *dinfo = NULL;
>
> /* Try to open distro debuginfo files */
> @@ -129,12 +131,28 @@ struct debuginfo *debuginfo__new(const char *path)
> if (!dso)
> goto out;
>
> + if (filename__read_build_id(path, bid, BUILD_ID_SIZE) > 0)
> + have_build_id = true;
> +
> for (type = distro_dwarf_types;
> !dinfo && *type != DSO_BINARY_TYPE__NOT_FOUND;
> type++) {
> if (dso__read_binary_type_filename(dso, *type, &nil,
> buf, PATH_MAX) < 0)
> continue;
> +
> + if (have_build_id) {
> + /* This can be fail because the file doesn't exist */
> + if (filename__read_build_id(buf, bid2,
> + BUILD_ID_SIZE) < 0)
> + continue;
> + if (memcmp(bid, bid2, BUILD_ID_SIZE)) {
> + pr_warning("WARN: There is a build-id mismatch between\n %s\n and\n %s\n"
> + "Please check your system's debuginfo files for mismatches, e.g. check the "
> + "versions for the target package and debuginfo package.\n", buf, path);
> + continue;
> + }
> + }
> dinfo = __debuginfo__new(buf);
> }
> dso__put(dso);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists