[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b353bb05-e9ea-86b7-7f34-c4c0f6b308fb@fsfe.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 17:25:38 +0100
From: Carmen Bianca Bakker <carmenbianca@...e.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...aro.org>,
Jonas Oberg <jonas@...e.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@...il.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V5 02/11] LICENSES: Add the GPL 2.0 license
Hi all,
Since December, `GPL-2.0` is no longer the correct identifier for the
licence. The American FSF has been in talks with the SPDX Workgroup to
change it to `GPL-2.0-only`.
See the rationale here:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/identify-licenses-clearly.html
See the new canonical licence list here:
https://spdx.org/licenses/
This change is valid for all GPL licences. Similarly, `GPL-2.0+` has
been changed to `GPL-2.0-or-later`.
I believe that this patch should be changed to reflect that. The
identifiers used in this patch are still valid, but deprecated.
Yours sincerely,
--
Carmen Bianca Bakker
Technical Intern
Free Software Foundation Europe e.V.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists