linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/37] 4.4.110-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Jan 2018 18:13:25 +0100
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Pavel Tatashin <soleen@...il.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/37] 4.4.110-stable review

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:11:02PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Can't this be because more patches are required in 4.4 to support this
> > patch set ? Or maybe a manual fix for a conflict that went wrong ? Just
> > trying to guess.
> 
> Odd thing is, the 4.9 series started from the 4.4 code for most of the
> patches, so I would expect that one to fail...

I see. Then maybe a missing patch somewhere in 4.4 compared to 4.9 :-/
I have no idea what to look for however.

Willy