linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f09641b7-a9e9-24d1-ce13-1b627d077ce5@lechnology.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:50:06 -0600
From:   David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework



On 1/4/18 6:39 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Monday 01 January 2018 05:09 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>> This converts all of arch/arm/mach-davinci to the common clock framework.
>> The clock drivers from clock.c and psc.c have been moved to drivers/clk,
>> so these files are removed.
>>
>> There is one subtle change in the clock trees. AUX, BPDIV and OSCDIV
>> clocks now have "ref_clk" as a parent instead of the PLL clock. These
>> clocks are part of the PLL's MMIO block, but they bypass the PLL and
>> therefore it makes more sense to have "ref_clk" as their parent since
>> "ref_clk" is the input clock of the PLL.
>>
>> CONFIG_DAVINCI_RESET_CLOCKS is removed since the common clock frameworks
>> takes care of disabling unused clocks.
>>
>> Known issue: This breaks CPU frequency scaling on da850.
> 
> This functionality needs to be restored as part of this series since we
> cannot commit anything with regressions.
> 

Do you have a suggestion on how to accomplish this? I don't have a board 
for testing, so I don't have a way of knowing if my changes will work or 
not.

>>
>> Also, the order of #includes are cleaned up in files while we are touching
>> this code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
> 
> This is a pretty huge patch again and I hope it can be broken down.
> Ideally one per SoC converted and then the unused code removal.
> 

Will do.