[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180104185613.kpv2k7e64tdz3776@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:56:13 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] x86/spec_ctrl: Add sysctl knobs to enable/disable
SPEC_CTRL feature
+ Tom.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 10:54:38AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 01/04/2018 10:38 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >> And then, if at all, this needs to be connected to the retpolines fun,
> >> methinks, so that it can be decided at boot what to use.
> Yes, we need to reconcile this with the retpoline. I've tried to
> capture what we do where in here:
>
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSMrwkaoSUBAFc6Fjd19F18c1O9pudkfAY-7lGYGOTN8mc9ul-J6pWadcAaBJZcVA7W_3jlLKRtKRbd/pub
>
> Any feedback on this, especially on the CPUs that aren't specifically
> covered would be welcome.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists