linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 00/15] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Clean up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:50:24 -0800
From:   Caleb Crome <caleb@...me.org>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc:     Timur Tabi <timur@...i.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        mail@...iej.szmigiero.name,
        Arnaud Mouiche <arnaud.mouiche@...oxia.com>, lukma@...x.de,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/15] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Clean up - program flow level

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:28:11PM -0800, Caleb Crome wrote:
>
>> tested this patch set on MX6 SSI against broonie for-next (4.15-rc5),
>> no problems.
>> Do I send a separate Tested-by for each patch, or just the 00/15 one?
>
>> Tested-by: Caleb Crome <caleb@...me.org>
>
> I will include your Tested-by to each patch in v2 unless there is
> going to be a critical change suggested by the future reviews so
> that we need another round of full testing. Thank you

Great.

-Caleb