[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe2784b3-2e5a-198c-eed6-83a6e8d3ebd1@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 13:13:44 -0800
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86: Use IBRS for firmware update path
On 01/04/2018 12:51 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 09:56 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
>> @@ -44,6 +47,7 @@ static inline void apm_bios_call_asm(u32 func, u32 ebx_in,
>> u32 ecx_in,
>> "=S" (*esi)
>> : "a" (func), "b" (ebx_in), "c" (ecx_in)
>> : "memory", "cc");
>> + unprotected_formware_end();
>
> Just an obvious typo (form/firm) but I thought I'd report it.
>> }
>>
>> static inline bool apm_bios_call_simple_asm(u32 func, u32 ebx_in,
>> @@ -52,6 +56,7 @@ static inline bool apm_bios_call_simple_asm(u32 func, u32
>> ebx_in,
>> int cx, dx, si;
>> bool error;
>>
>> + unprotected_firmware_begin();
>> /*
>> * N.B. We do NOT need a cld after the BIOS call
>> * because we always save and restore the flags.
>> @@ -68,6 +73,7 @@ static inline bool apm_bios_call_simple_asm(u32 func, u32
>> ebx_in,
>> "=S" (si)
>> : "a" (func), "b" (ebx_in), "c" (ecx_in)
>> : "memory", "cc");
>> + unprotected_formware_end();
>> return error;
>> }
>
> Same here.
>
Thanks. Noted.
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists