linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8fcd9bf8-249b-7e0b-0e37-70f011ab1b7e@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:12:12 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework

On Friday 05 January 2018 08:29 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 01/04/2018 11:50 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 1/4/18 6:39 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:

>>> This is a pretty huge patch again and I hope it can be broken down.
>>> Ideally one per SoC converted and then the unused code removal.
>>>
>>
>> Will do.
> 
> Well, I can do this, but I don't think it will compile or run. We can't
> have the common clock framework and the legacy davinci clocks enabled at
> the same time.

I see. Can you at least hive off the code removal into a separate patch
for next submission. I will then take a closer look at this.

Thanks,
Sekhar