[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1515150349.29312.108.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 11:05:49 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] IBRS patch series
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 06:25 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Retpoline also looks incompatible with CET, so future Intel CPUs will
> eventually need a different approach anyway.
CPUs with CET will have the indirect branch problem fixed, so the
retpoline ALTERNATIVE will be used which is a bare 'jmp *%reg'.
That's why we switched the ABI for the retpoline from having the target
address on the stack, to passing it in in a register.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists