[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801051438280.1724@nanos>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 14:40:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86: Use IBRS for firmware update path
On Thu, 4 Jan 2018, Tim Chen wrote:
> #ifdef APM_ZERO_SEGS
> # define APM_DO_ZERO_SEGS \
> "pushl %%ds\n\t" \
> @@ -28,6 +30,7 @@ static inline void apm_bios_call_asm(u32 func, u32 ebx_in, u32 ecx_in,
> u32 *eax, u32 *ebx, u32 *ecx,
> u32 *edx, u32 *esi)
> {
> + unprotected_firmware_begin();
> /*
> * N.B. We do NOT need a cld after the BIOS call
> * because we always save and restore the flags.
> @@ -44,6 +47,7 @@ static inline void apm_bios_call_asm(u32 func, u32 ebx_in, u32 ecx_in,
> "=S" (*esi)
> : "a" (func), "b" (ebx_in), "c" (ecx_in)
> : "memory", "cc");
> + unprotected_formware_end();
This doesn't even compile unless the new compiler speculates that into
unprotected_firmware_end().
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists