linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] IBRS patch series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:26:25 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org>
Cc:     Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@...ian.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] IBRS patch series

On 05/01/2018 15:01, Greg KH wrote:
>> Obviously it lacks a *lot* of processors (especially pre-Haswell).
> 
> I'm running Arch, but it would be nice to know where those microcode
> updates came from, given that they aren't on the "official" Intel page
> yet :)

Those from November seem way too early to include IBRS/IBPB.  Maybe the
two from December 3rd, but I wouldn't be 100% sure.

So it would be even nicer to know how those microcode updates were tested.

(And by the way, the LFENCE change is for variant 1 aka CVE-2017-5753).

Paolo