linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/37] 4.4.110-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:25:33 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/37] 4.4.110-stable review

On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 08:38:23PM +0100, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
>>
>> When I start 4.4.110-rc1 on a virtual machine (qemu) init throws a
>> segfault and the kernel panics (attempted to kill init).
>> The VM host is a Haswell system.
>>
>> The same kernel binary boots fine on a (other) Haswell system.
>>
>> I tried:
>>
>> 4.4.110-rc1     broken
>> 4.4.109         ok
>> 4.9.75-rc1      ok
>>
>> All systems are OpenSuSE 42.3 64bit.
>>
>> qemu is started only with:
>> qemu-system-x86_64 -m 2048 -enable-kvm  -drive
>> file=tvsuse,format=raw,if=none,id=virtdisk0 -device
>> virtio-blk-pci,scsi=off,drive=virtdisk0
>>
>> Am I the only one who sees this? Has anyone booted that kernel on qemu?
>
> I've now released 4.4.110, which had 4 more patches on top of what
> 4.4.109-rc1 had in it, that should hopefully resolve these issues.
>
> Can you test that and let me know if you still have problems?

It's fixed. I can boot 4.4.110 on qemu without problems so far.

./test_vsyscall_64 still fails though, like Kees wrote about 4.4.110-rc1
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/5/123

That's another issue?


  Thank you very much.

       Thomas