[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXMSBGM89Ziti-+p71NB6xyXHri1ewJZ50Yt+qw0kbnig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 09:53:16 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] selftests/x86: Add test_vsyscall
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:33 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:38:37PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Also, I want to add vsyscall=emulate_noread that makes the vsyscall
>> page be --x. And I want to add a per-process option to turn off
>> vsyscalls.
>
> What for?
>
> It sounds like a bunch of work for something which is deprecated
> anyway...
>
emulate_noread would avoid one exploit technique that Kees saw
somewhere. And per-process disablement would let a system remain
compatible with old binaries without reducing security for newer
binaries.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists