[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <08190E47-05B3-4599-A415-DE4276D56B3F@amacapital.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 11:22:21 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] selftests/x86: Add test_vsyscall
> On Jan 5, 2018, at 11:10 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 10:45:49AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Not _PAGE_RW. Probably _PAGE_USER somewhere in the hierarchy.
>
> Yeah, just realized that. But it must be somewhere in the PT hierarchy
> because:
>
> 0xffffffffff600000-0xffffffffff601000 4K USR ro NX pte
>
> So something up needs to take _PAGE_USER too.
>
> But WTF does it say NX there for and still can execute the vsyscall
> test? Oh boy, what a mess...
>
It's emulated! We catch the page fault and fake the whole thing :)
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists