[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <B974F3CA-6A2A-42EB-A478-3606BCCB520D@amacapital.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:10:02 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] selftests/x86: Add test_vsyscall
> On Jan 5, 2018, at 11:28 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 11:22:21AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> It's emulated! We catch the page fault and fake the whole thing :)
>
> Then I'm really confused. It says "ro" above, which means _PAGE_RW is
> not set so page is read-only.
>
> I must be missing something...
>
It's meant to be read-only, user-acccessible, NX as far as the CPU is concerned. When user code calls it, we get an instruction fetch fault, and the kernel fixes it up.
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists