lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 6 Jan 2018 01:44:58 +0530
From:   "Kohli, Gaurav" <gkohli@...eaurora.org>
To:     Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:     jslaby@...e.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mikey@...ling.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: fix data race in n_tty_receive_buf_common

Hi Alan,


On 1/5/2018 7:45 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> But in above case , there we can hit another race, if we have a sequence
>> like this
>> tty_init_dev->alloc_tty_struct -> tty_ldisc_init -> this will initialize
>> ldisc ,
>> but at this moment disc_data is still NULL
>>
>> And if flush_to_ldisc comes in between, it will take ldisc reference and
>> proceeds receive buffer.
> So you need to move the lock up one line to protect the assignment to
> tty->port->itty. We can do that.
>
> At that point your flush_to_ldisc should see either port->itty = NULL or a
> valid initialized ldisc.
>
>

Yes , with little modification this should work.

+retval =  tty_ldisc_lock(tty, 5 * HZ);
+if (retval)
+         goto err_release_lock;
tty->port->itty = tty;
/*
* Structures all installed ... call the ldisc open routines.
* If we fail here just call release_tty to clean up.  No need
* to decrement the use counts, as release_tty doesn't care.
*/
retval = tty_ldisc_setup(tty, tty->link);
         if (retval)
             goto err_release_tty;
tty_ldisc_unlock(tty);
err_release_tty:
tty_unlock(tty);
tty_info_ratelimited(tty, "ldisc open failed (%d), clearing slot %d\n",
     retval, idx);
     release_tty(tty, idx);
     return ERR_PTR(retval);

+err_release_lock;
+tty_ldisc_unlock(tty);
+return ERR_PTR(retval);

Please let me know if above modification seems fine , then we can upload 
this and try reproduction of Bug.

Regards
Gaurav

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ