[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180105220636.bd3atkyetexjvj27@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 23:06:36 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Cc: "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"keescook@...gle.com" <keescook@...gle.com>,
"gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>,
"dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
"jikos@...nel.org" <jikos@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...ux-foundation.org" <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] x86/retpoline: Add initial retpoline support
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 10:00:19PM +0000, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> OK, this one looks saner, and I think I've tested all the 32/64 bit
Dunno, I think Brian's suggestion will make this even simpler:
ALTERNATIVE(NOP, K8: lfence)
ALTERNATIVE(jmp indirect, RETPOLINE: jmp thunk)
Hmm?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists