[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d2457b1-9cfb-f9b4-2d7c-69fd99492375@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 10:23:09 -0800
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] x86/spec_ctrl: Add sysctl knobs to enable/disable
SPEC_CTRL feature
On 01/06/2018 09:33 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 01/06/2018 06:41 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> .macro DISABLE_IBRS
>>> - ALTERNATIVE "jmp .Lskip_\@", "", X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL
>>> + testl $1, dynamic_ibrs
>> On every system call we end up hammering on this 'dynamic_ibrs'
>> variable. And it looks like it can be flipped via the IPI mechanism.
>>
>> Would it make sense for this to be per-cpu?
>
> It's probably better to either just make it __read_mostly or get the
> static branches that folks were suggesting actually working.
>
dynamic_ibrs is indeed declared __read_mostly
+unsigned int dynamic_ibrs __read_mostly;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dynamic_ibrs);
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists