[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180106191622.GJ21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 19:16:22 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/31] net: add support for ->poll_mask in proto_ops
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:00:16AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The socket file operations still implement ->poll until all protocols are
> switched over.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> include/linux/net.h | 3 +++
> net/socket.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/net.h b/include/linux/net.h
> index c2d468cb9821..94d65de30cb7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/net.h
> +++ b/include/linux/net.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ struct proto_ops {
> int (*getname) (struct socket *sock,
> struct sockaddr *addr,
> int *sockaddr_len, int peer);
> + void (*pre_poll) (const struct sock *sk);
Description? Or more descriptive name, for that matter...
> + __poll_t (*poll_mask) (struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
> + __poll_t events);
Does that sucker need struct file?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists