[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1515207534.21799.0.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 03:58:54 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Tao Wu <lepton@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/37] 4.4.110-stable review
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 15:28 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 6:03 AM, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 14:34 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, we found two patches that were missing in 4.4-stable that were in
> >> the SLES12 tree (thanks to Jamie Iles), now I only have 19k more to sift
> >> through :)
> >
> > As you know, in enterprise, uname -r means you might find something
> > this old in your kernel if you look hard enough :)
>
> Mike, I think there's a good chance that Greg's 4.4.110 final will fix
> your "segfault at ffffffffff5ff100" crashes: please give it a try when
> you can, and let us know - thanks.
Already done, and yes, it did.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists