[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DDC0A53C62D26D419EFD5F13B1AD3EA5BE9763BB@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 18:32:50 +0000
From: "Lu, Hongjiu" <hongjiu.lu@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
"Tsimbalist, Igor V" <igor.v.tsimbalist@...el.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
"gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 13/12] Retpoline vs. CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_SYMBOLS
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>; Andi Kleen
> <ak@...ux.intel.com>; Van De Ven, Arjan <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>;
> Tsimbalist, Igor V <igor.v.tsimbalist@...el.com>; Paul Turner
> <pjt@...gle.com>; LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>; Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-
> foundation.org>; Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>; Hansen, Dave
> <dave.hansen@...el.com>; Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>; Rik van
> Riel <riel@...hat.com>; Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>; Andy
> Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>; Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>;
> gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 13/12] Retpoline vs.
> CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_SYMBOLS
>
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2018, Lu, Hongjiu wrote:
>
> > Please checkout patches for GCC 7:
> >
> > https://github.com/hjl-tools/gcc/commits/hjl/indirect/gcc-7-branch/mas
> > ter
> >
> > For GCC trunk:
> >
> > https://github.com/hjl-tools/gcc/commits/hjl/indirect/master
>
> What's the plan for these vs. official GCC? Is that stuff going to part of GCC
> and if so, which versions of GCC will have that?
If I get positive feedbacks from kernel folks with my GCC 7 patches today, I
will submit my patches for GCC 8 today. After they are checked in, I will
backport them to GCC 7/6/5/4.9.
H.J.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists