[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOFm3uGCJmPiHF_tGVXSUXbiGyK2HP-0Ahfv7SS+dJrmnkc5WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 13:03:57 +0100
From: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To: Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>,
Åsmund Østvold <asmund.ostvold@...cle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] runchecks: Generalize make C={1,2} to support
multiple checkers
Knut,
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 17:50 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com> wrote:
>>> > Add scripts/runchecks which has generic support for running
>>> > checker tools in a convenient and user friendly way that
>>> > the author hopes can contribute to rein in issues detected
>>> > by these tools in a manageable and convenient way.
<snip>
>>> > --- /dev/null
>>> > +++ b/scripts/runchecks
>>> > @@ -0,0 +1,734 @@
>>> > +#!/usr/bin/python
>>> > +
>>> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Thank you for using an SPDX tag here .... .
<snip>
>>> > +#
>>> > +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>> > +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
>>> > +# as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>> > +
....but then please DRY: do not add this extra legalese which is redundant.
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
Powered by blists - more mailing lists