[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y3l880js.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 09:09:59 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, npiggin@...il.com,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>, mikey@...ling.org,
oohall@...il.com, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] powerpc/64s: Allow control of RFI flush via sysfs
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Sorry, I wasn't aware about your efforts and did not cc you. I've just
> queued a more generic sysfs interface for this whole mess:
No worries.
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180107214913.096657732@linutronix.de
>
> It should be simple to extend for write and it would be great if all
> affected architectures could share it.
As you say this has all been a bit of a mess, and as a result we already
have people running kernels with this patch, so we don't want to remove
the 'rfi_flush' file.
But we will certainly add support on powerpc for the files you have
created, in addition to 'rfi_flush'.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists