[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8c0c142-2a69-648b-1389-a4467a26211b@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 08:23:02 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] clocksource/drivers: atmel-pit: allow unselecting
ATMEL_PIT
On 07/01/2018 19:44, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 07/01/2018 at 19:07:13 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 05/01/2018 15:30, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>> With the new TCB clocksource driver, atmel platforms are now able to boot
>>> without the PIT driver. Allow unselecting it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 9 ++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>> index 5609572e0236..55ccfa0ba63b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>> @@ -381,7 +381,14 @@ config ARMV7M_SYSTICK
>>>
>>> config ATMEL_PIT
>>> select TIMER_OF if OF
>>> - def_bool SOC_AT91SAM9 || SOC_SAMA5
>>> + bool "Atmel Periodic Interval Timer (PIT)"
>>> + depends on SOC_AT91SAM9 || SOC_SAMA5
>>> + default SOC_AT91SAM9 || SOC_SAMA5
>>> + help
>>> + Select this to get a clocksource based on the Atmel Periodic Interval
>>> + Timer. It has a relatively low resolution and the TC Block clocksource
>>> + should be preferred.
>>> + It also provides a clock event device.
>>
>> Please conform to the format:
>>
>> config ATMEL_PIT
>> bool "Atmel Periodic Interval Timer (PIT)" if COMPILE_TEST
>> select ...
>> help
>> bla bla
>>
>> and select ATMEL_PIT from the platform's Kconfig.
>>
>
> Well, the goal is actually to allow people to unselect it so we don't
> want the platform to select it.
Why do you need people to unselect it?
The goal of the Kconfig here is to be silent except in the case the
COMPILE_TEST option is set for cross-compilation test coverage.
We are migrating all these options to this format. Please make it silent.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists