linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: ratelimit end_swap_bio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180108083742.GB5717@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jan 2018 09:37:42 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: ratelimit end_swap_bio_write() error

On Mon 08-01-18 10:58:18, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/06/18 14:34), Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > zsmalloc allocation is just one possibility; an error in
> > > compressing algorithm is another one, yet is rather unlikely.
> > > most likely it's OOM which can cause problems. but in any case
> > > it's sort of unclear what should be done. an error can be a
> > > temporary one or a fatal one, just like in __swap_writepage()
> > > case. so may be both write error printk()-s can be dropped.
> > 
> > Then I would suggest starting with sorting out which of those errors are
> > critical and which are not and report the error accordingly. I am sorry
> > to be fuzzy here but I am not familiar with the code to be more
> > specific. Anyway ratelimiting sounds more like a paper over than a real
> > solution. Also it sounds quite scary that you can see so many failures
> > to actually lock up the system just by printing a message...
> 
> the lockup is not the main problem and I'm not really trying to
> address it here. we simply can fill up the entire kernel logbuf
> with the same "Write-error on swap-device" errors.

Your changelog is rather modest on the information. Could you be more
specific on how the problem actually happens, how likely it is?

And again, I do not think the throttling is an appropriate counter
measure. We do want to print those messages when a critical situation
happens. If we have a fallback then simply do not print at all.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs