linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] apparmor fix for 4.15-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1ce75bd1-35fe-fd01-5202-811d250adccf@canonical.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jan 2018 01:39:41 -0800
From:   John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] apparmor fix for 4.15-rc7

On 01/07/2018 11:40 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 5:53 AM, John Johansen
> <john.johansen@...onical.com> wrote:
>>
>> can you please pull the following regression fix for apparmor.
> 
> Pulled.
> 
> I do note that you still don't seem to have any signatures on your key.
> 
> You've used it for a couple of months, any chance to get somebody to sign it?
> 

Strange, it should have signatures from Greg KH, Kees Cook, James
Bottomly Serge Hallyn, and several others in the kernel community

Locally the gpg --list-sigs looks good, but I won't claim to really
know gpg, and maybe there is something messed up. I'll poke at and see
if I can't figure out what is up. If needed I can certainly grab Kees
Cook and maybe a few others local to the Portland area, and I'll be at
Fosdem at the end of the month so I can pickup a few more there.

> Even without signatures, it's a fine key and validates that it's the
> same person (or controlling entity) that keeps doing this, but it
> would be even better if there was an actual chain of trust in addition
> to the basic key.
> 
>                Linus
>