lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180108114553.37buovfs7qimokzq@mwanda>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jan 2018 14:45:53 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Martin Kelly <martin@...tingkelly.com>
Cc:     Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: fix cross-compile var export

On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 10:51:21AM -0800, Martin Kelly wrote:
> Urg, I accidentally sent to kernel-kbuild instead of linux-kbuild, changed
> now. It appears that past changes to tools/scripts/Makefile.include have
> been handled by linux-kbuild and often Masahiro Yamada.
> 
> Perhaps the best sequence here is to send a patch to kbuild adding the
> call-override function and calls to it to the main common Makefile. Then I
> can send individual subsystem patches dropping the individual CC = lines and
> similar. It will be 13 patches instead of 1 but will eventually result in
> the same thing.
> 
> Paul, any thoughts?
> 

That sounds good.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ