[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <138620e379794e98b606ed675da6d04d@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:00:28 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Network Development" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 06/18] x86, barrier: stop speculation for failed access_ok
From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 07 January 2018 19:47
...
> Also, people definitely *are* noticing the performance issues with the
> current set of patches, and they are causing real problems. Go search
> for reports of Amazon AWS slowdowns.
Try over 35% slowdown....
Given that AWS instance runs known code (user and kernel) why do we
need to worry about any of these sideband attacks?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists