[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23bd8a874faf8ec048299f919799f86f.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:45:44 -0000
From: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"Andi Kleen" <ak@...ux.intel.com>, "Paul Turner" <pjt@...gle.com>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@...gle.com>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...capital.net>,
"Jiri Kosina" <jikos@...nel.org>, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] x86/retpoline: Add initial retpoline support
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 10:53:02AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 11:45 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Should this not use local name labels instead?
>> >
>> > .macro RETPOLINE_JMP reg:req
>> > call .Ldo_rop_\@
>> > .Lspec_trap_\@:
>> > pause
>> > jmp .Lspec_trap_\@
>> > .Ldo_rop_\@:
>> > mov \reg, (%_ASM_SP)
>> > ret
>> > .endm
>>
>> Not if you want to be able to use them twice in the same .S file.
>
> Should work fine, the \@ expands to a per-instance magic thing IIRC. All
> the PTI helpers do this too and that works just fine, see
> arch/x86/entry/calling.h
>
Ah, OK. Will do that when home in a few hours then.
--
dwmw2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists