[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180108124707.GH32035@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:47:07 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] x86/spec_ctrl: Add sysctl knobs to enable/disable
SPEC_CTRL feature
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 07:12:12PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 01/05/2018 06:12 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
> > .macro ENABLE_IBRS
> > - ALTERNATIVE "jmp .Lskip_\@", "", X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL
> > + testl $1, dynamic_ibrs
> > + jz .Lskip_\@
>
> There was an earlier suggestion to use STATIC_JUMP_IF_... here. That's
Yes, and thanks for Cc'ing me... :/
> a good suggestion, but we encountered some issues with it either
> crashing the kernel at boot or not properly turning on/off.
>
> We would love to do that minor really soon, but we figured everyone
> would rather see this version than wait for us to debug such a minor tweak.
Its not minor, you need that LFENCE without it. Which makes the whole
thing unconditionally expensive, which sucks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists