linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 22/38] x86 / CPU: Avoid unnecessary IPIs in arch_freq_get_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180108125917.354574436@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  8 Jan 2018 13:59:15 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        WANG Chao <chao.wang@...oud.cn>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 22/38] x86 / CPU: Avoid unnecessary IPIs in arch_freq_get_on_cpu()

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

commit b29c6ef7bb1257853c1e31616d84f55e561cf631 upstream.

Even though aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() caches the samples.khz value to
return if called again in a sufficiently short time, its caller,
arch_freq_get_on_cpu(), still uses smp_call_function_single() to run it
which may allow user space to trigger an IPI storm by reading from the
scaling_cur_freq cpufreq sysfs file in a tight loop.

To avoid that, move the decision on whether or not to return the cached
samples.khz value to arch_freq_get_on_cpu().

This change was part of commit 941f5f0f6ef5 ("x86: CPU: Fix up "cpu MHz"
in /proc/cpuinfo"), but it was not the reason for the revert and it
remains applicable.

Fixes: 4815d3c56d1e (cpufreq: x86: Make scaling_cur_freq behave more as expected)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: WANG Chao <chao.wang@...oud.cn>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
@@ -42,10 +42,6 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void
 	s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, s->time);
 	unsigned long flags;

-	/* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */
-	if (time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS)
-		return;
-
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf);
 	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf);
@@ -74,6 +70,7 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void

 unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
 {
+	s64 time_delta;
 	unsigned int khz;

 	if (!cpu_khz)
@@ -82,6 +79,12 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cp
 	if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF))
 		return 0;

+	/* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */
+	time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), per_cpu(samples.time, cpu));
+	khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
+	if (khz && time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS)
+		return khz;
+
 	smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1);
 	khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
 	if (khz)