linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] pwm: pwm-omap-dmtimer: Adapt driver to utilize dmtimer pdata ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fd544471-63d0-dbf1-cee5-53f05c837cdd@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:03:49 +0530
From:   Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To:     Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
        <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, <tony@...mide.com>,
        <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC:     <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <t-kristo@...com>, <ladis@...ux-mips.org>,
        <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] pwm: pwm-omap-dmtimer: Adapt driver to utilize
 dmtimer pdata ops



On Monday 08 January 2018 02:14 PM, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02.01.2018 12:09, Keerthy wrote:
>> Adapt driver to utilize dmtimer pdata ops instead of pdata-quirks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
>> Tested-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
>> index 5ad42f3..3b27aff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_data/dmtimer-omap.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_data/pwm_omap_dmtimer.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> @@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip {
>>  	struct pwm_chip chip;
>>  	struct mutex mutex;
>>  	pwm_omap_dmtimer *dm_timer;
>> -	struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_pdata *pdata;
>> +	struct omap_dm_timer_ops *pdata;
>>  	struct platform_device *dm_timer_pdev;
>>  };
>>  
>> @@ -242,19 +243,33 @@ static int pwm_omap_dmtimer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>  	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>  	struct device_node *timer;
>> +	struct platform_device *timer_pdev;
>>  	struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip *omap;
>> -	struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_pdata *pdata;
>> +	struct dmtimer_platform_data *timer_pdata;
>> +	struct omap_dm_timer_ops *pdata;
>>  	pwm_omap_dmtimer *dm_timer;
>>  	u32 v;
>>  	int status;
>>  
>> -	pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>> -	if (!pdata) {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing dmtimer platform data\n");
>> +	timer = of_parse_phandle(np, "ti,timers", 0);
> of_node_put() should be called when done with device_node pointer returned
> by of_parse_phandle() (you may want to check the return ERROR cases below
> regarding this statement):
>> +	if (!timer)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	timer_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(timer);
>> +	if (!timer_pdev) {
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to find Timer pdev\n");
> here
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	timer_pdata = dev_get_platdata(&timer_pdev->dev);
>> +	if (!timer_pdata) {
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dmtimer pdata structure NULL\n");
> here
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (!pdata->request_by_node ||
>> +	pdata = timer_pdata->timer_ops;
>> +
>> +	if (!pdata || !pdata->request_by_node ||
>>  	    !pdata->free ||
>>  	    !pdata->enable ||
>>  	    !pdata->disable ||
>> @@ -270,10 +285,6 @@ static int pwm_omap_dmtimer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	timer = of_parse_phandle(np, "ti,timers", 0);
>> -	if (!timer)
>> -		return -ENODEV;
>> -
>>  	if (!of_get_property(timer, "ti,timer-pwm", NULL)) {
> here
>>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing ti,timer-pwm capability\n");
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>> @@ -291,13 +302,7 @@ static int pwm_omap_dmtimer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  
>>  	omap->pdata = pdata;
>>  	omap->dm_timer = dm_timer;
>> -
>> -	omap->dm_timer_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(timer);
>> -	if (!omap->dm_timer_pdev) {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to find timer pdev\n");
>> -		omap->pdata->free(dm_timer);
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> -	}
>> +	omap->dm_timer_pdev = timer_pdev;
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Ensure that the timer is stopped before we allow PWM core to call
>>
> And all the other return instructions from probe function not listed by git diff

Thanks for reviewing. I will add the of_node_put call for all the error
paths.

>