lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180108144558.GA6826@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jan 2018 15:45:58 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc:     Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lustre <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] staging: lustre: lnet: convert selftest to use
 workqueues

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:25:19PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> Instead of the cfs workitem library, use workqueues.
> 
> As lnet wants to provide a cpu mask of allowed cpus, it
> needs to be a WQ_UNBOUND work queue so that tasks can
> run on cpus other than where they were submitted.

This patch doesn't apply to my tree :(

> apply_workqueue_atts needs to be exported for lustre to use it.

That feels really odd, why is lustre so "special" that the normal
workqueue api doesn't work properly for it?

I've dropped this, and the next patch, from my queue now.  Please fix up
and resend and justify why lustre is so odd :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ