linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Per-task PTI activation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180108170616.GE10913@1wt.eu>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:06:16 +0100
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Per-task PTI activation

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:59:54AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 01/08/2018 08:12 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > I could experiment a bit with the possibility to enable/disable PTI per
> > task. Please keep in mind that it's not my area of experitise at all, but
> > doing so I could recover the initial performance without disabling PTI on
> > the whole system.
> 
> This cc list is way too small.  Please at *least* include me and Andy on
> this kind of stuff.

You're welcome Dave. In fact you were the two I initially copied from
another thread and seeing the huge amount of CCs I preferred to stick
to recent discussions and cc x86 thinking all people involved were there.

Feel free to suggest a wider list. Maybe all the CCs of the latest PTI
patch ?

Thanks,
Willy