[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180108174224.GE6176@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:42:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] x86/spec_ctrl: Add sysctl knobs to enable/disable
SPEC_CTRL feature
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:28:12AM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> On 01/08/2018 08:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 01:47:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> a good suggestion, but we encountered some issues with it either
> >>> crashing the kernel at boot or not properly turning on/off.
> >
> > The below boots, but I lack stuff to test the enabling.
>
> Peter,
>
> Thanks. Will give it a spin. One other concern is if
> JUMP_LABEL is not configured, this may not work, and
> we may still need fall back to a control variable.
Urgh yes.. I always forget about that case. Will the retpoline crud be
backported to a GCC old enough to not have asm-goto? If not, we could
make all of this simply require asm-goto.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists